Competency Analyze the history of healthcare quality improvement and how it shapes current and future quality initiatives. Scenario You are the Quality Director of a local health system. Your organization has decided to seek accreditation through the Joint Commission.Your first task has been penned by the CEO to prepare for the accreditation process by conducting a literature review on the impact of accreditation on quality of care. The review of literature should include the historical underpinnings of quality initiatives since the publishing of the blockbuster report by the Institute of Medicine To Err is Human – and an evaluation of the developments in quality initiatives over the past two decades. Upon completing the review of literature, you are asked to compile a report highlighting the history of quality improvement and the significance of quality initiatives on the future of care delivery. Your report should support the organizations goal of earning accreditation through the Joint Commission. Instructions Complete a report that encompasses the history of Quality Healthcare, which focuses on the ways in which quality improvement has changed over time and how past initiatives shape current and future quality initiatives. At a minimum, your report should include: An assessment of the accreditation process and its role in improving quality of care. A review of the quality initiatives that have been developed in recent years and the impact of the initiatives on the quality of care delivered. Support for accreditation based on the review of literature on quality from the historical perspective to future implications. A discussion on the fundamental changes that have been implemented since the IOMs report and potential for continuous quality improvement. Recommendations for your organization to prepare for the accreditation process based on your review of literature and your assessment of the overall process. RUBRICS: 1. Clear and thorough assessment of the accreditation process and its role in improving quality of care. Includes comprehensive examples with multiple supporting evidence. 2. Clear and thorough review of the quality initiatives that have been developed in recent years and the impact of the initiatives on the quality of care delivered. Included comprehensive descriptions with multiple supporting examples. 3. Comprehensive analysis of the support for accreditation based on the review of literature on quality from the historical perspective to future implications. Included three or more examples of the differences between quality assurance and quality improvement. 4. Report contained clear, concise, and thorough discussion on the fundamental changes that have been implemented since the IOM’s report and potential for continuous quality improvement. 5. Comprehensive recommendations for your organization.
Please review the following link and watch the section videos.Refer to tutorials at...
FIN 370 Week 4 Assignment - Cash Flow Analysis...
IDEA emphasizes the value of inclusion for students with disabilities in the general education classroom. What are some positive effects of �...
My papers for this assignment for the quarter are attached.Body1....
Can someone start some physics labs? Finish all labs for $250...
I have typed this essay and I need it to be fixed grammatically. Also I need the writer to explain or try to expand it as much as possible...
questions...
This is the fourth and last part of an assignment that we have been doing since the beginning of the course. I have attached assignments 1-3 that w...
One post (answering the initial forum question) AND a m...
Unit II Scholarly ActivityMost problems companies face are due to a lack of information; with accurate...
The theory application paper is a 9-10-page paper that gives the student the opportunity to apply one of the theories covered in this course to a r...
Other samples, services and questions:
Calculate Price
When you use PaperHelp, you save one valuable — TIME
You can spend it for more important things than paper writing.
